In the competitive world of professional basketball, a rising star’s journey is often fraught with fierce rivalries and grueling challenges. However, according to a shocking report that has been circulating and gaining traction, the case of Angel Reese is not merely a conventional fight for a spot in the WNBA. It is, allegedly, a meticulously orchestrated campaign, a calculated conspiracy said to have been carried out by the league itself, the sports media, and even her own team, all with the singular purpose of protecting and elevating another star: Caitlin Clark.

This report paints a bleak picture of systemic injustice and manipulation, accusing that Angel Reese is the target of a systematic, three-pronged campaign designed to derail her career. The first and most compelling point of this allegation lies in the way referees handle her games. The report suggests there are underlying directives to “neutralize” Angel Reese on the court, ensuring she is unable to play to her full, physical potential. A prime example cited is a game between the Chicago Sky and the Minnesota Lynx. Despite being a player with a physical and aggressive style, the Chicago Sky were granted only eight free-throw attempts, while their opponents, the Lynx, were awarded 17. This is framed as a “disgusting double standard” created to protect Caitlin Clark, who is portrayed as a “symbol of purity,” and to give her a “sanitized” path to the basket. The objective is to ensure Clark never has to contend with a truly physical and assertive opponent like Reese.

The second prong of the alleged conspiracy targets the sports media, which is accused of acting as a tool for Angel Reese’s public “character assassination.” The video singles out prominent sports analyst Stephen A. Smith. The report claims that Smith’s public criticisms of Angel Reese were not genuine, unbiased analysis but rather “assigned talking points” from WNBA leadership. The objective, it is argued, was to tarnish Reese’s image, painting her as an “immature, jealous child” in the eyes of the public. This narrative not only devalues Reese as a player but also poisons her reputation as a person, turning her into the easily detested villain in a narrative where Clark is the media-anointed princess.

Perhaps the most troubling part of the accusation is the claim that Reese was “betrayed” from within her own team. The report points to the infamous “clipboard incident” on July 8, 2025, when Reese angrily slapped a clipboard from an assistant coach’s hand. This event is framed as the culmination of months of “internal sabotage” from the coaching and management staff. Furthermore, when Reese publicly demanded better players for her team, she was suspended for “making statements detrimental to the team.” The report argues that this was a “calculated character assassination” aimed at painting her as a disloyal malcontent, and that management successfully created a divisive atmosphere in the locker room, isolating Angel Reese and leaving her to fight her battles alone.

The report concludes, however, that despite these systematic attacks, Angel Reese has continued to put up “historic numbers” on the court. The attempts to cast her as a villain have allegedly failed, as she continues to receive widespread support from a dedicated segment of fans. This story is not just a rivalry between two basketball stars; it is a chilling cautionary tale about the dark side of professional sports, where fame, power, and manipulation can overshadow truth and fair play.