Joy Behar Faces Savage Roasts from Bill Maher and Greg Gutfeld: A Reality Check for Daytime TV’s Most Polarizing Host

In the world of television, few figures manage to divide audiences as effectively as Joy Behar. As a co-host of The View, Behar has spent over two decades offering her opinions on everything from politics to pop culture, often with the bravado of someone who believes their words carry the weight of wisdom. But as the tides of public discourse shift, two television personalities—Bill Maher and Greg Gutfeld—have decided to call out Behar’s brand of over-the-top political commentary with a blistering mix of humor, sarcasm, and biting critique.

The result? A comedic clash that not only pokes fun at Behar but also underscores the growing frustration with the state of modern television punditry and political discourse.

Behar’s Role on The View: A Microcosm of Political Divide

For over 20 years, The View has been a cultural fixture in American households, largely due to its panel of outspoken hosts discussing current events and political issues. At the heart of this dynamic is Behar, whose unapologetically liberal stances have often garnered praise from like-minded viewers while inciting disdain from those on the opposite end of the political spectrum.

Her approach to discussing political issues has often been loud, direct, and unyielding. In a world where shouting matches are increasingly common, Behar has positioned herself as an icon of emotional theater. Whether it’s passionately defending progressive causes or denouncing conservative viewpoints, she has become the face of political correctness on daytime TV. But in an era where political opinions are often weaponized for ratings, Behar’s brand of commentary has started to feel less like a thoughtful discourse and more like a repetitive cycle of hot takes, soundbites, and self-righteous indignation.

As Behar continues to deliver her opinions with fervor, the cracks in her approach have not gone unnoticed by her critics. Enter Bill Maher and Greg Gutfeld—two television personalities whose approach to commentary couldn’t be more different from Behar’s.

Bill Maher: The Sarcasm Scalpel

Bill Maher, the host of Real Time with Bill Maher, has long been known for his sharp wit and irreverent style. With a career built on sarcastic monologues and political satire, Maher has made a name for himself as a commentator who isn’t afraid to call out the absurdities on both sides of the political spectrum. However, Maher’s recent critiques of Behar mark a new chapter in his ongoing battle against what he perceives as the hollow intellectualism of mainstream television pundits.

Maher’s brand of comedy is one that thrives on deconstructing the ridiculousness of modern political discourse. He is quick to target anyone who he believes is hiding behind intellectual pretenses to advance an agenda. In Behar, Maher has found a perfect target. From her often exaggerated stances to her tendency to engage in moral grandstanding, Behar represents everything Maher finds frustrating about political talk shows. His sharp rants dissect Behar’s commentary with the precision of a surgeon, pointing out the flaws in her reasoning while simultaneously mocking the self-assured air she often projects.

One of Maher’s signature moves is to roll his eyes at political figures who operate under the guise of moral superiority. And in his eyes, Behar has become the embodiment of this brand of self-righteous commentary. Maher doesn’t just disagree with Behar—he undermines her entire persona, calling out her misplaced sense of moral authority with the casual disdain of someone who’s seen it all before. The result is a roast so savage it feels like a controlled burn, leaving Behar’s once-formidable presence on The View feeling vulnerable and exposed.

Greg Gutfeld: The Satirical Smackdown

While Maher’s approach is intellectual and methodical, Greg Gutfeld’s comedic style is more akin to a stand-up comedian with a penchant for sarcasm and irreverence. As the host of Gutfeld!, a late-night talk show that blends satire and political commentary, Gutfeld has built a reputation as a provocateur who loves to skewer anyone who dares to take themselves too seriously.

Gutfeld’s take on Behar is no different. He views her as a relic of a bygone era, an overinflated personality who confuses noise with substance. To Gutfeld, Behar isn’t just a political pundit—she’s a walking, talking embodiment of what’s wrong with modern media. With a hyperactive sense of humor, Gutfeld doesn’t just engage in debate with Behar—he reduces her entire persona to a running joke, exposing her for the hollow spectacle she has become.

Rather than addressing her arguments head-on, Gutfeld pokes fun at the absurdity of her public persona. Behar’s moral grandstanding and tendency to lecture others have become prime targets for Gutfeld’s satirical humor. He treats her commentary as if it were a bad stand-up set, punctuating her every word with snarky jabs and sarcastic asides. To him, Behar’s liberal politics are a punchline, and he’s more than happy to make her the butt of the joke.

A Common Target: The Pitfalls of Political Punditry

What makes the Maher-Gutfeld takedown of Behar so fascinating is the commonality in their critique. Despite coming from vastly different ideological corners, both Maher and Gutfeld share a disdain for what Behar represents: the decline of meaningful political discourse in favor of sensationalism and moral outrage.

For Maher, the problem with Behar is that she has become a symbol of political correctness taken to an extreme, offering a version of reality that ignores nuance and complexity in favor of sweeping, emotionally charged judgments. Gutfeld, on the other hand, sees Behar as a product of the liberal media elite, someone who has elevated loud opinions and self-righteousness to a level where genuine debate has no room to thrive. Both men, in their own ways, see Behar as a figurehead for the collapse of meaningful political discussion on TV—one that prioritizes spectacle over substance.

The irony of the situation is that Behar, who has built her career on being a forceful and uncompromising voice in the media, now finds herself the subject of ridicule from two of the most prominent figures in contemporary television. It’s a stark reminder that even the loudest voices in the room can be toppled by those who are willing to challenge the prevailing narratives.

The Cultural Implications: Shifting the Narrative

At the heart of Maher and Gutfeld’s attacks on Behar lies a larger conversation about the state of media and political discourse in the 21st century. In an era where soundbites and hot takes dominate the airwaves, the need for genuine, thoughtful debate has never been more urgent. Maher and Gutfeld’s savage takedowns of Behar serve as a reminder that comedy, satire, and intellectual critique still have a vital role to play in the media landscape—particularly when it comes to challenging the unchecked arrogance of those who believe their opinions are beyond reproach.

For Behar, the stakes have never been higher. As the self-appointed moral voice of daytime television, she must now contend with the growing backlash from those who see her as part of a larger trend of shallow, performative punditry. Whether she can recover from this public roasting or whether she will continue to double down on her brand of political commentary remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: in the world of modern television punditry, no one is safe from the sarcasm scalpel of Bill Maher and the snarky zingers of Greg Gutfeld.